In Travian you had the ability to construct runescape 3 gold multiple buildings at once but in Dragons of Atlantis you can only build one at a time. It doesn't affect the overall game as it's simply a game mechanic but it felt slow. It just felt like you couldn't get as much done each time you visited the game.
That something I don understand, maybe you can help me with it. At abbys and gargoyles (I assuming you don use aggros at rippers and kalgs), if I always have multiple ones attacking me because of multitagging with mage, how is aggro pots faster? Can you kill them faster with a scythe than with corruption and dragonbreath? I know that aggro pots are commonly stated to be higher kill rates, but how much faster is it in reality? Not trying to be argumentative, I genuinely want to understand.
Egyptian archaeologists have discovered two ancient tombs (left main) belonging to high ranking men who were part ofKing Khafre's priests in the Old Kingdom period from 2563 2423 BC. Egypt's antiquities ministry said one of the men in one of the tomb's was named Behnui Ka, who had seven titles including the Priest and the Judge to the Pharoah. The other tomb belonged to another man named Nwi, who served as Chief of the Great State and 'purifier' of the Khafre (in bottom right).
Lets order all these teams in order of how many tests they play: 1. England, 2. Australia, 3. India, 4. NZ. I think Australia plays only marginally more tests than India so we can assume its basically even. Root is the least consistent of the 4 but the number of tests he plays will more than offset that issue and keep him in the race. Smith and Kohli are probably the closest but even at his best, I don think Kohli was still as good as Smith was in his pre ban peak. They put up a good fight for 2nd place but it all depends on Smith post ban form. Williamson, in terms of ability alone, is at par with the rest but being handicapped with significantly lesser tests means he won get anywhere close. If we assume that all batsmen finish their careers having played roughly the same number of years of test cricket then I think it end something like this: 1. Root (has the most runs despite debuting last among fab 4 and being the least in form, simply because England play the most), 2. Kohli (so dominant and seems to have good consistent form in tests after a rough start to test career), 3. Smith (the best when he at his peak but he surely take at least a few series to get back in form), 4. Williamson (probably the most aesthetically pleasing of the fab 4 and in good form but he played less tests than Root Kohli even though he was the first to debut)
